BRT good concept with devilish details … not a done deal for Ashland… your input is needed

Date: 
08/21/2013
BegPhaseOneCortland

Looking south at beginning point of proposed BRT Phase I--Ashland and Cortland 

In the last two weeks, the subject of the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) on Ashland Ave. had residents, business owners and organizational people polarized on both ends of the subject with others trying to wrap their mind around the idea.

The devil still seems to be in the details but for the first time, a BRT representative said, "This is not a done deal. We have zero dollars for features and zero dollars for construction…We want as much feedback as possible." 

End1stBRTPhase

South of Archer, looking north, from the end of the proposed Phase I--Ashland and 31st St. (Archer)

There was commonality in dialogue at the meetings of East Village Association (EVA), the Wicker Park Committee (WPC), Industrial Council of Northwest Chicago (ICNC) and the Ashland-Western Coalition as well as in conversations with individuals who will be effected by this transformational concept. 

Concept
The BRT project and its vision was created by the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) in partnership with the Chicago Department of Transportation (CDOT), the Department of Housing and Economic Development and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 

The concept is to move more people faster on public transportation. In the long run, such a system is to meet the needs of an increasing population and reduce automobile usage. Most people agree that those are good goals. To achieve this, Chicago’s BRT vision is to balance the needs of all street users, improve quality of life in local neighborhoods, provide better access to jobs and services and make local streets more attractive, safer and less congested. 

An example of this is the Blue Line. Most people who use it do not think twice about taking public trans versus driving to O'Hare or into the loop, expect for special occasions. They gladly take the "El," knowing that they will be at their destination in a shorter amount of time with the cost being that of the CTA, not that of using their vehicle and the high cost of parking. 

Expected Advantages
The direct advantages to be gleaned from the overall BRT concept are:

  • Having faster rides with dedicated lanes, limited stops and transit signal priority
  • Moving more people
  • Allowing for and encouraging urban growth
  • Reducing vehicle use which leads to making the environment greener (less pollution) 

Each of these advantages then has a series of benefits that can positively impact quality of life across all economic levels and generations. 

Process to date
While the points above sound good to most people, there is the reality of applying this concept to Ashland Ave. Currently CTA has bus service that runs from 5800 North to 104th South. The full length for the project (16 miles) is intended to go from Irving Park Rd. (4000 North) on the north to 95th St. on the south, linking with 37 bus routes, 7 CTA trains and 5 Metra trains. Phase one is proposed to go from Cortland to 31st St. 

To date they have spent 7,000 hours doing traffic counts and modeling flow and speeds as well as usage along Ashland Ave. As with other projects in the City, they used the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning's (CMAP) broad overview software looking at highway impact then using Synchro  which works off CMAP to show the impact at intersections. 

JIacobucci

Joe Iacobucci

Progress to date
Joe Iacobucci, CTA, Strategic Planning and Policy, explained at EVA's Aug. 5  meeting, "In order to get a candid response [on the project], we have to adopt a project vision, present it and have you respond to that." The CTA and the Chicago Department of Transportation (CDOT) are in the process of developing a proposal to deliver to the public. However, before making the formal presentation, they have been talking with local groups. In September and October they are to have a couple of public meetings at which they are to present the whole proposal with data from various studies. 

When asked why they released some information but not the whole presentation to date, Iacobucci said that they wanted to engage as many people as possible. "We want everyone to express their opinion," he said. Then based on public input and technical analysis, the go or no-go decision will eventually be made. 

Funding
He also said that this project is not a done deal and that there are no funds set aside to pay for the project. With an estimated cost of $10 million per mile, they will be looking for a grant from the Federal Transportation Administration (FTA) Small Starts program. According to Iacobucci this could provide funding of $25-250 million and locally there would probably be a 20% match required. Such funding is not possible, however, until the project has gone through several more phases as explained by the FTA*.  

NorthAndAshland

Looking south on Ashland at North Ave.

Reality vs Concept
With details no more spelled out than in April, people are very skeptical, concerned and distrustful of what is going to transpire with the purposed  BRT running down the center of Ashland Ave. 

Fulton300N

Looking south on Ashland at Fulton (700N)

Some of the devilish details brought out are:

  • reduction of two lanes of traffic, one traffic lane in each direction
  • no left turns
  • reduction of parking by 8%
  • reduction of loading zones by 4%
  • no bike lanes
  • reducing two-lane north-south streets to two in the entire City (Western and Cicero Avenues)
  • rider safety: center-street stations require passengers to cross traffic 
720SFlournoy

Looking south on Ashland at Flournoy (720S)

The public's response to two of the key questions above brought forth other facts and questions:

  • One lane of traffic
    • This will include continuation of existing local bus traffic for handicapped and seniors
    • How will deliveries for residential and commercial be possible in many cases? (Often no alley deliveries are possible. What about UPS, Fedex and other truck deliveries to residents and business establishments?)
    • Emergency vehicles are to be accommodated by using the bus lanes (What about the safety and reality that the different surface levels could cause unexpected slipperiness in winter. What happens when the emergency vehicle is blocked by bus and cars?)
    • This will add to the existing congestion 
SoOf14th

Looking south, south of 14th

  • No left turns
    • How will access to businesses not be impacted if access is more complicated?
    • Local streets will have to accommodate more commercial and passenger vehicles (damaging not only streets but also homes)
    • No thru traffic across Ashland on several east west streets will also impact accessibility for commercial and residential 
      AshlandGrand

      Looking south on Ashland at Grand Ave.

Other Responses
A long time resident who lived just off of Ashland near Belmont and still works just east of Ashland on Division commented, "When they put the planters in, that was bad enough in increasing congestion, to say nothing of the construction phase.

"This is going to make it next to impossible! It is one of only a couple of streets where you can more quickly travel from north to south in the City." 

Though the Active Transportation Alliance has indicated that they are ok with there being no bike lanes on Ashland, many cyclists do not share that opinion.

A retail florist and wholesaler, Kennicott Brothers Company has been in business in Chicago since 1881 and are currently located at 452 N. Ashland Ave. "The BRT on Ashland is a two-edged sword," said Red Kennicott, Kennicott's CEO. "Traveling here for our employees could be easier  and faster but congestion for customers and deliveries could be very difficult." Currently traffic is so heavy that a stoplight is needed at Hubbard, said Kennicott. The idea that Hubbard would no longer be an east-west thru street left him somewhat speechless. 

PContursi

Phil Contursi

"With no left turns and Hubbard without cross traffic, customer trucks and commercial delivery trucks will have to probably use Grand and Paulina to get to our location," said Dan Andrews, a Kennicott Manager. "That is a concern for those other streets, particularly if they are residential." 

Even a local eatery could be affected by this new configuration said Andrews about Gaudi Café at the corner of Ashland and Hubbard. "Though they have a lot of local customers, not being able to cross Ashland can impact their business as well… This last weekend, I noticed people with signs on various corners along Ashland saying 'Save Ashland Ave.' It looks like alot of residents are concerned too." 

DickmanPaige

At the WPC meeting, Paul Dickman and John Paige

Reflecting on how many businesses went out of business during a two-year construction period on Roosevelt Rd., an ICNC member, Phil Contursi, Product productions, Inc. on Grand Ave., said that the business community needs to begin being proactive about this project. "Things will happen that no one has thought of and it will take longer than expected, so we need to plan ahead." 

"BRT is a new way of doing things," explained John Paige, a city planner who is a Commissioner on Wicker Park / Bucktown's SSA #33, a bicyclist and public transportation user. "Think of BRT as a web. It connects various transportation systems together. It will take about 20 years for Chicago's system to evolve and Ashland is a good place to start." 

MGiza

Mike Giza

Mike Giza, Mike's Furniture, 1259 N. Ashland, spoke at the WPC meeting saying that his family's business, which opened in 1975, can not get big trucks in the alley behind their store. While they have an unloading zone on Ashland, they often have multiple trucks delivering at the same time which does then block a traffic lane. 

RRomanelli

Roger Romanelli

Roger Romanelli, Executive Director, Randolph/Fulton Market Association (RFMA), explained at the WPC meeting that, that his organization and the Ashland-Western Coalition are not against BRT nor are they Nimbies ("not in my backyard"). "We think there should be alternatives. There have been no improvements to transportation on Ashland since streetcars were removed and buses were put on the route in 1957." 

Alternative
A group, the Ashland-Western Coalition, was formed around the issue of BRT when the discussions began in choosing Western or Ashland as the next BRT line. 

They believe that transportation should improve on Ashland but that it should be done for less cost and less impact on surrounding areas.Their concept is Modern Express Bus (MEB).

As stated in their material, "Our MEB concept includes positive aspects of BRT; positive aspects of other bus systems; and common sense ideas to modernize bus service with Ashland's current street configuration:

Street Configuration

    • Maintain two vehicle lanes in each direction
    • Maintain vehicle left turns

Safer Neighborhoods
No new vehicles flooding neighborhoods seeking traffic congestion relief or left turn relief

Less Cost to Taxpayers

    • One modernized bus operation instead of two buses (BRT, local bus)
    • Emphasis on 21st century technology over 20th century street reconstruction 

Faster Buses and Passenger Boarding

    • Reduce stops by 30% by placing stops at 1/4-mile intervals instead of BRT’s 1/2–mile or today’s 1/7-mile intervals
    • Special stops for CTA and METRA stations and for schools, churches, social services and hospitals
    • Stops across intersections to expedite vehicle right turns and reduce traffic congestion
    • Traffic-signal technology to expedite traffic and increase bus speeds
    • Intersection bus-jumps by removing 60’ of north and south corner parking

Faster Passenger Boarding

Fare boxes for quick-scan passes instead of cash fares that slow boarding, front and rear boarding

Better Bus Stop Locations and Amenities

    • Maintain curbside service for better passenger safety and consistent with locations of CTA/METRA stations
    • Install larger, heated and lit shelters at all bus stop corners for basic amenities and for east-west bus riders

Vegetation and Street/Sidewalk Improvements

    • Retain and expand median planters, increase parkway trees, encourage rooftop gardens
    • Repair deteriorated and missing sidewalks, install superior crosswalks/streetlights/vehicle speed-limit signs

Expanded Service and Hours
New north service to Clark St. for Uptown, Ravenswood, Andersonville and Edgewater; 24-hour service

How to Pay for MEB
Beyond FTA funding for BRT systems, CTA’s FY2013 budget identifies many other federal programs:

“FTA grant programs include Alternative Analysis (AA), Bus and Bus Facilities/State of Good Repair grants (SOGR), Bus and Bus Facilities/Bus Livability Initiatives, Clean Fuels Program, the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER), TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act), Innovation, Coordination, and Enhancement program (ICE), Unified Work Program (UWP), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality grant (CMAQ) and Department of Homeland Security grants.”

CTA should develop an MEB cost estimate, allowing taxpayers to have an educated choice on this historic issue. 

EVAResidents

Like these EVA residents Chris Long and Rich Anselmo, everyone who will be touched by BRT on Ashland needs to be involved

Wrap up
As stated at the beginning of this story, most people are interested in moving people in the city faster on public transportation in Chicago. BRT is agreed upon as a good concept. Opinions on how and where to implement this vary. 

Whereas the original transportation issues in the 1800s and early 1900s were focused on getting people into downtown Chicago, the needs have changed, while much of the transportation routes have remained in the same spoke-like configuration. 

Decisions to make these big changes are really in the hands of the people...you and me,,, IF we choose to participate. 

September and October will present opportunities for you…and me…to hear what the stats are. Then it is up to all of us to talk about it…not just accept it...but discuss it. 

CTA has repeatedly said, "We take your concerns very seriously." So it will be up to us to make sure they do. We'll let you know when to plan to attend a meeting. 

In the meantime… let's hear your opinions right here!

* 1/2014...this document is no longer available to link to.

Related:

Comments

Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) is so

Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) is so essential these days in big cities and metros to help working people to reach their work places in time. The transport department make sure that the road construction and route map must be very clear and not much heavy traffic for a successful Rapid Transit service.

Why not just an express bus

Why not just an express bus that only stops at major arteries such as Division, North, Fullerton, etc. I don't know why they got rid of express busses in the first place.

nice discussion on the

nice discussion on the critical issue. We do not have enough time to sit back and write discourses. We have to do immediate actions. Thanks

CTA Group Opposes Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Projects

Citizens Taking Action, a transit advocacy group comprised of transit dependent riders, has come out in opposition to plans to install bus rapid transit (BRT) on streets such as Ashland and Western Avenues. The organization has studied and compiled a list of bus routes either eliminated altogether, or with severely reduced hours of service, since CTA was established in 1947. It maintains that showcase projects like bus rapid transit (BRT), at costs of upwards to 10M per mile, simply don't make sense when people are unable to get to work or get home, using conventional buses and trains, due to a recent series of service cut-backs the past few years. Charles Paidock, Secretary, said that: "One has to look at the system as a whole, especially if you are a transit dependent rider, and if public transit is to seriously be considered as an alternative to owning a car. The number of cuts in routes and schedules have come so swiftly lately that we haven't had time to update our data. Of particular concern is when buses stop running earlier and earlier, and passengers have no way of getting home, and are left stranded if they miss the last bus. We are looking into how many neighborhoods are without 24 hour service, which is significant. Only two El lines operate all the time. And only very rarely is there a public hearing before changes are made in routes or schedules." Kevin Peterson, another member of the group, said, "If you compare CTA schedules over the past 3 or so years, the list of routes has been reduced significantly. Also, the information on the system map doesn't at times match the actual schedule. The signs CTA puts up on poles tell your nothing. There's a reason for that. CTA will shorten the beginning or ending time on a route without notifying passengers. It's almost impossible to keep up with all of the changes to the system." Mr. Peterson added that: "CTA eliminated express buses on Ashland and other routes, claiming that they were not necessary, and not allegedly attracting enough ridership. So now CTA wants to spend money on new buses and stations for a service that it said was not useful to the public, by their own admission. If they had really decent service, without bus bunching, and 60' articulated buses, none of this would be necessary, and we wouldn't be having this discussion." In addition, the group feels that if you are going to spend this much on new infrastructure, that a light rail system, as is being presently put in about 25 other cities across the country, would be preferable to buying a new fleet of BRT buses, with doors on the left, which cannot be used elsewhere It is generally felt that passengers prefer taking trains to buses. New light rail systems are emission free, and although expensive, the vehicles last decades longer than buses, and can be boarded at street level without the need for steps or platforms. Another group of citizens have gotten together in opposition to BRTs, called the Ashland-Western Coalition, a volunteer group of residents, churches, schools, businesses, and community organizations, that have expressed serious concerns over reduced parking and losing traffic lanes in both directions on one of the city’s most used north-south corridors. The coalition is encouraging the CTA to improve bus service on Ashland and Western by modernizing the popular express buses that operated along both streets from 2002 through 2010. Those buses stopped every half a mile and at CTA stations, and ran concurrently with standard buses, which stopped about every 1/6 or 1/8 of a mile. The next monthly open meeting of Citizens Taking Action will be on Monday, September 9th, from 7-9:00 PM, at 77 W. Washington, 4th Floor. Information is available at: www.CTAriders.org Organizers may be reached as below: Charles Paidock cpaidock@hotmail.com (312) 714-7790 Kevin Peterson transitcatt@hotmail.com (773) 896-8126

MEB is a joke

I literally witnessed a member of this "coalition" say that she will NEVER ride a bus, no matter what you do to it, she will drive till the state takes away her license. This group only wants to protect a driving lane. I live 2 blocks off Ashland and would love to see real BRT running down the middle of it. The difference between me and the AWC is that my husband and I don't have a car and we rely on transit, bikes, I-Go, and the ocassional taxi. BRT would vastly improve access along Ashland for the majority of people and encourage more car-free people to live here. The reason it would be so great is 95% dependent on having a dedicated lane. You take that away and the bus goes back to being sucky. Read Streetsblog Chicago to learn more about this group and their plan: http://chi.streetsblog.org/2013/08/07/dont-be-fooled-ashland-western-coalition-is-against-modern-bus-service/

Is This Another Priatization Deal Disguised

At $10 million per mile and no funding in site - why is this being done - why spend so much money and effort on these plans and meetings? Is this going to be put out out bid by the Mayor's Infrastructure Trust? Will this be a dressed up Parking Meter Deal - where we grant monopoly rights to a private company for using our public way and then extracting profits with little risk and no oversight? If you want to help us keep on eye on these deals email tom@civiclab.us

MEB BS

MEB is not a long-term solution. It is a way to deflect progress and urban growth. An express bus was already tried on Ashland. BRT is the most cost effective solution without building an elevated or underground train line.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Insert images and media with <pp_img> or <pp_media>. See formatting options for syntax.

More information about formatting options